1. EU gives Google four month deadline for privacy policy changes
October 16, 2012
European Union data protection watchdogs have given Google four months to rework its recently overhauled privacy policy in order to better protect users’ rights. It follows a France-led probe into the legality of the Internet giant’s policies.
If Google doesn’t comply, it could face disciplinary action at the national level.
A letter from 24 of 27 of the bloc’s data protection regulators, which was made public after being obtained by Reuters prior to its official announcement Tuesday, follows a running investigation opened by France this spring into the legality of Google’s method of collecting user data. Introduced in March, the company’s new guidelines consolidated 60 separate privacy policies into one and collate user data from across Google’s services, which include Gmail and YouTube.
EU regulators included a list of 12 “practical recommendations” that would bring Google’s privacy policy and data collection closer to European legal norms. The suggestions are reported to center on the automatic collection of personal data ranging from browsing histories, to real-time location, to credit card details.
Brussels stopped short of calling Google’s corporate practices illegal, but said, “Combining personal data on such a large scale creates high risks to the privacy of users," according to Reuters.
Though users must agree to the policy in order to use any Google service, regulators hint in the letter that the company’s current policy does not explicitly ask for user consent when combining data.
Combining user data across platforms allows Google to better identify targets for advertisements. The company maintains that the new policy also provides users better search results, and is completely compliant with European laws.
However, Google “may be prepared to test the legal position in Europe to see what they can get away with," said Chris Watson, an attorney at international law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.
Watson referred to Google’s privacy policy and advertising tactics as “aggressive.”
The company can either negotiate with regulators and change elements of its privacy policy or challenge their authority in court. The data protection watchdogs that examined the new approach cannot rule on its legality because they are not a court of law.
Google global privacy counsel Peter Pleischer said the company would examine the results of the investigation, adding that Google was confident its privacy policy respected EU law.
The incident comes at a touchy time for Google, which is already under investigation by European antitrust officials who suspect the company may intentionally place competitor-related websites lower in its search results.
Source

    EU gives Google four month deadline for privacy policy changes

    October 16, 2012

    European Union data protection watchdogs have given Google four months to rework its recently overhauled privacy policy in order to better protect users’ rights. It follows a France-led probe into the legality of the Internet giant’s policies.

    If Google doesn’t comply, it could face disciplinary action at the national level.

    A letter from 24 of 27 of the bloc’s data protection regulators, which was made public after being obtained by Reuters prior to its official announcement Tuesday, follows a running investigation opened by France this spring into the legality of Google’s method of collecting user data. Introduced in March, the company’s new guidelines consolidated 60 separate privacy policies into one and collate user data from across Google’s services, which include Gmail and YouTube.

    EU regulators included a list of 12 “practical recommendations” that would bring Google’s privacy policy and data collection closer to European legal norms. The suggestions are reported to center on the automatic collection of personal data ranging from browsing histories, to real-time location, to credit card details.

    Brussels stopped short of calling Google’s corporate practices illegal, but said, “Combining personal data on such a large scale creates high risks to the privacy of users," according to Reuters.

    Though users must agree to the policy in order to use any Google service, regulators hint in the letter that the company’s current policy does not explicitly ask for user consent when combining data.

    Combining user data across platforms allows Google to better identify targets for advertisements. The company maintains that the new policy also provides users better search results, and is completely compliant with European laws.

    However, Google “may be prepared to test the legal position in Europe to see what they can get away with," said Chris Watson, an attorney at international law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.

    Watson referred to Google’s privacy policy and advertising tactics as “aggressive.”

    The company can either negotiate with regulators and change elements of its privacy policy or challenge their authority in court. The data protection watchdogs that examined the new approach cannot rule on its legality because they are not a court of law.

    Google global privacy counsel Peter Pleischer said the company would examine the results of the investigation, adding that Google was confident its privacy policy respected EU law.

    The incident comes at a touchy time for Google, which is already under investigation by European antitrust officials who suspect the company may intentionally place competitor-related websites lower in its search results.

    Source

    1. anotherdamneconproject reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
    2. someassemblyrequiredd reblogged this from wak3thefuckup
    3. privacyorcontrol reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
    4. kktharsis reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    5. brilliantmindofothers reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    6. dieweisheit reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    7. femme-de-noir reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    8. creepmagnetclubpresident reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    9. timetogetbuckwild reblogged this from anyeharmnone
    10. sea-of-weeds reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    11. almarose reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    12. ghostingthespace reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    13. cyberviking reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    14. anyeharmnone reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    15. skellington-fucker reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    16. tangotwitches reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    17. slothtanic reblogged this from anarcho-queer
    18. anarcho-queer reblogged this from mochente
    19. mochente reblogged this from canadian-communist
    20. occupyingyourpolitics reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
    21. fightingscholarlykrogan reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
    22. thekidnamedjosh reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord

The People's Record

Paper theme built by Thomas

Recent Post

Read more